4.5 Article

Fabrication of YDC electrolytes via polyol method and investigation of their properties for IT-SOFCs

期刊

IONICS
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 2841-2851

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-023-05021-y

关键词

SOFC; Conductivity; Cerium oxide; Electrolyte; Yttrium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ce1 - xYxO2 - x/2 (YDC) powders were successfully prepared via polyol method, and all the prepared YDC powders exhibited a single-phase fluorite structure after calcination at 500 degrees C. The nominal dopant concentrations of YDC samples were in good agreement with the values obtained by EDS. The crystallite sizes varied depending on the dopant concentration, and the lattice parameters of YDC samples followed Vegard's law. YDC pellets with high relative densities were obtained by sintering at 1400 degrees C for 6 hours. The ionic conductivities of YDC pellets significantly increased until x = 0.15, reaching 2.23 x 10(-2) S cm(-1) for YDC15 at 800 degrees C. YDC20 showed a small increase of 12% in ionic conductivity at the same measurement temperature, reaching 2.5 x 10(-2) S cm(-1).
Ce1 - xYxO2 - x/2 (YDC) powders were successfully prepared using the polyol method. All of the prepared YDC powders were found to have a single-phase fluorite structure after calcination at 500 degrees C. It was also determined that nominal dopant concentrations of YDC samples were very close to the values obtained by EDS. The crystallite sizes varied in the range of 11.54-15.76 nm depending on the dopant concentration, and the lattice parameters of YDC samples were compatible with Vegard's law. YDC pellets with high relative densities were obtained via sintering at 1400 degrees C at 6 h. The ionic conductivities of YDC pellets increased significantly until x = 0.15, and YDC15 exhibited an ionic conductivity of 2.23 x 10(-2) S cm(-1) at 800 degrees C. The ionic conductivity of YDC20 showed a small increase of 12% at the same measurement temperature, reaching 2.5 x 10(-2) S cm(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据