4.5 Article

Fluctuations in loneliness due to changes in frequency of social interactions among older adults: a weekly based diary study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610223000133

关键词

loneliness; social loneliness; emotional loneliness; fluctuation; social interactions; weekly-based diary; older adults

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the fluctuations in loneliness among older adults and its relationship with social interactions. It found that emotional loneliness is more dominant in determining overall feelings of loneliness and is sensitive to externally chosen social interactions.
Objectives:Loneliness functionally varies and is determined by the degree of interaction with others. We examined weekly fluctuations in reported loneliness as a function of frequency of social interactions in old age. We hypothesized that emotional and social components of loneliness would be related to different types of social relationships. Design:Participants reported their feeling of loneliness and their social interaction quantity (frequency of meetings) via a weekly based diary, over 6 weeks. Setting:Diary study. Participants:The study included 55 older adults with different dwelling arrangements (M = 73.4, SD = 6.97). Measurements:Measures of Loneliness (the De Jong-Gierveld Loneliness Scale), Social Interaction and Contact, and sociodemographic parameters were used. Results:Social and emotional loneliness fluctuated over the course of the 6-week study. Frequency of meeting friends was related to emotional loneliness and total feelings of loneliness. Frequency of meeting close/trusted figures was related to emotional loneliness which appeared the following week. Other variables were not associated with either changes in loneliness or its dimensions. Conclusions:Loneliness in old age is changeable. The emotional component of loneliness seems to be dominant in determining overall feelings of loneliness and is more sensitive to externally chosen social interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据