4.7 Article

Pool boiling on micro-structured surface with lattice Boltzmann method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108170

关键词

Pool boiling; Lattice Boltzmann method; Micro -structure; Nucleation; Wettability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, pool boiling on micro-pillar structured surfaces was investigated using a three-dimensional pseudo potential phase-change lattice Boltzmann method. The joint enhancing effects of surface wettability and pillar geometrical parameters on bubble nucleation and boiling performance were analyzed. It was found that on neutral and hydrophobic surfaces, increasing the spacing of micro pillars delayed nucleation, but reduced the temperature inside the vapor film and improved heat conduction. On hydrophilic surfaces, the impact of pillar spacing on nucleation was non-monotonic and more complex, with an enhanced heat flux and significantly different nucleation positions.
In this paper, pool boiling on micro-pillar structured surfaces is studied by using a three-dimensional pseudo potential phase-change lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). The joint enhancing effects on bubble nucleation and boiling performance are discussed in detail regarding various surface wettability and pillar geometrical parameters. Results show that on neutral and hydrophobic surfaces, enlarging the spacing of micro pillars delays the nucleation but can reduce the temperature inside vapor film and improve heat conduction. Despite that increasing the pillar height can improve heat flux, it is adverse to nucleation due to the increased cooling effect on the roots of micro pillars. In contrast, on hydrophilic surfaces, the impact of pillar spacing on nucleation is not monotonous and relatively much complicated. The heat flux is enhanced with increasing pillar spacing because of the extended three-phase contact line. And, the nucleation positions differ significantly by varying pillar geometrical parameters on hydrophilic surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据