4.6 Article

Colchicine in High-risk Patients with Acute Minor-to-moderate Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CHANCE-3): Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 873-878

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17474930231172312

关键词

Ischemic stroke; inflammation; colchicine; randomized controlled trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CHANCE-3 study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial that aims to investigate the efficacy of colchicine therapy in patients with acute minor-to-moderate ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The study will randomly assign 8,238 patients with high-sensitivity CRP level of >= 2 mg/L to receive colchicine or placebo, in addition to optimal medical therapy. The primary outcome is the occurrence of any stroke within 3 months of randomization, with a goal of detecting a 25% reduction in the colchicine group.
Background: Anti-inflammatory therapy using colchicine has reduced recurrent vascular events in patients with coronary heart disease. Design: Colchicine in High-risk Patients with Acute Minor-to-moderate Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CHANCE-3) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial, in which 8,238 patients with acute minor-to-moderate ischemic stroke (NIHSS <= 5) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) (ABCD(2) score >= 4) and a high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) level of >= 2 mg/L will be randomly assigned within 24 h of symptom onset to colchicine (1 mg daily on days 1-3, followed by 0.5 mg daily for a total of 90 days) or matching placebo, on a background of optimal medical therapy. The study will have 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in the primary efficacy outcome of any stroke within 3 months of randomization. Adverse events potentially related to the use of colchicine will also be analyzed. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据