4.7 Article

An elitist cuckoo search algorithm for combined heat and power economic dispatch

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2173511

关键词

Combined heat and power; cuckoo search; economic dispatch; optimisation; swarm intelligence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a new variant of cuckoo search algorithm, elitist CS (yECS), to solve the CHPED problem. By introducing the elitist mechanism and coordinated mechanism, yECS achieves good performance in both global search and local search phases. Through tests and case studies, the yECS algorithm achieves feasible optimal dispatch results for CHPED problems, and shows significant improvements over other CS variants and recent literature results.
Combined heat and power economic dispatch (CHPED) is one of the foremost subjects in the operation of power systems. In this article, a new variant of cuckoo search (CS) algorithm, elitist CS (yECS), is advanced to tackle CHPED. During the optimisation process of the original CS as well as lots of its variants, the guidance of search directions relies merely upon the best individual, causing the loss of other beneficial information and further influencing their performance potentials. Therefore, in yECS, an elitist mechanism is developed to fully utilise the beneficial information of other elite individuals. Specifically, three new iterative strategies are developed, one for the global search phase and the other two for the local search phase. Further, a coordinated mechanism is put forward to effectively integrate the local iterative strategies, thus helping yECS in maintaining an appropriate balance between exploitation and exploration. The superior performance of yECS is firstly substantiated via CEC 2017 test suite and two engineering design problems and then it is utilised to address CHPED problems. All optimal dispatch results acquired by yECS are feasible and in most cases display remarkable improvements over the results determined by other CS variants and some recently-published literature results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据