4.4 Review

Parental beliefs in and attitudes toward teething signs and symptoms: A systematic review

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.13071

关键词

children; knowledge; primary teeth; signs and symptoms; systematic review; teething

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review investigated parents' beliefs and attitudes towards teething. The majority of parents believed in signs and symptoms associated with teething, with only a few of them choosing not to take any action and wait for the signs and symptoms to pass.
BackgroundParents believe that teething is associated with signs and symptoms, which may induce them to give medications that could harm their children. Some children may require alleviation of symptoms and overall attention. AimTo assess parents' beliefs in and attitudes toward teething. DesignThrough electronic databases and gray literature, this systematic review identified cross-sectional studies reporting parents' beliefs in, knowledge about, and attitudes toward the signs and symptoms of primary tooth eruption in children aged between 0 and 36 months. Three reviewers independently selected the studies, collected the information, assessed methodological quality, and checked for accuracy with disagreements solved by a fourth reviewer. The Agency of Research and Quality in Health questionnaire for cross-sectional studies was used for quality assessment. Descriptive analysis with median and interquartile ranges was adopted. ResultsTwenty-nine studies comprising 10 524 participants from all geographic regions were included. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate. Most parents have beliefs in signs and symptoms during dentition, the most reported symptom being the desire to bite. Oral rehydration was the most exposed attitude in the studies included. Only a small proportion of parents reported no attitude. ConclusionsThe majority of parents believed in at least one sign or symptom associated with teething, and only few of them would do nothing or just wait for the signs or symptoms to pass, with no difference among countries (Protocol doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2KZ3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据