4.7 Review

Recent Advances in Tick Antigen Discovery and Anti-Tick Vaccine Development

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054969

关键词

vaccinomics; antigen candidates; anti-tick vaccine; tick control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ticks can cause serious damage to human and animal health worldwide and result in significant economic losses annually. Chemical acaricides are commonly used for tick control but have negative impacts on the environment and contribute to the emergence of acaricide-resistant tick populations. Vaccines are considered a better alternative for tick control and have been developed using antigen-based approaches, with some already commercially available.
Ticks can seriously affect human and animal health around the globe, causing significant economic losses each year. Chemical acaricides are widely used to control ticks, which negatively impact the environment and result in the emergence of acaricide-resistant tick populations. A vaccine is considered as one of the best alternative approaches to control ticks and tick-borne diseases, as it is less expensive and more effective than chemical controls. Many antigen-based vaccines have been developed as a result of current advances in transcriptomics, genomics, and proteomic techniques. A few of these (e.g., Gavac(R) and TickGARD(R)) are commercially available and are commonly used in different countries. Furthermore, a significant number of novel antigens are being investigated with the perspective of developing new anti-tick vaccines. However, more research is required to develop new and more efficient antigen-based vaccines, including on assessing the efficiency of various epitopes against different tick species to confirm their cross-reactivity and their high immunogenicity. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements in the development of antigen-based vaccines (traditional and RNA-based) and provide a brief overview of recent discoveries of novel antigens, along with their sources, characteristics, and the methods used to test their efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据