4.7 Article

Multifunctional Oxidized Dextran as a Matrix for Stabilization of Octahedral Molybdenum and Tungsten Iodide Clusters in Aqueous Media

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210010

关键词

octahedral iodide cluster; molybdenum; tungsten; oxidized dextran polysaccharide; hydrolysis; stability; luminescence; cytotoxicity; photodynamic therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relevance of oxidized dextran polysaccharide in stabilizing photoactive nanoscale objects was demonstrated. The amount and ratio of functional groups as well as the molecular weight of oxidized dextran strongly affect the extent of stabilization. The most stable material based on the tungsten cluster complex showed low dark and moderate photoinduced cytotoxicity, making it promising for bioimaging and PDT.
Due to their high abundance, polymeric character, and chemical tunability, polysaccharides are perfect candidates for the stabilization of photoactive nanoscale objects, which are of great interest in modern science but can be unstable in aqueous media. In this work, we have demonstrated the relevance of oxidized dextran polysaccharide, obtained via a simple reaction with H2O2, towards the stabilization of photoactive octahedral molybdenum and tungsten iodide cluster complexes [M6I8}(DMSO)(6)](NO3)(4) in aqueous and culture media. The cluster-containing materials were obtained by co-precipitation of the starting reagents in DMSO solution. According to the data obtained, the amount and ratio of functional carbonyl and carboxylic groups as well as the molecular weight of oxidized dextran strongly affect the extent of stabilization, i.e., high loading of aldehyde groups and high molecular weight increase the stability, while acidic groups have some negative impact on the stability. The most stable material based on the tungsten cluster complex exhibited low dark and moderate photoinduced cytotoxicity, which together with high cellular uptake makes these polymers promising for the fields of bioimaging and PDT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据