4.7 Review

From Transgenesis to Genome Editing in Crop Improvement: Applications, Marketing, and Legal Issues

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087122

关键词

breeding; transgenesis; genome editing; biotech crops; biotech regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biotechnological approaches such as transgenesis and genome editing have become increasingly important for genetic improvement of crops. These approaches have led to the development of traits such as resistance to herbicides and insects, as well as traits related to human population growth and climate change. However, the use of these approaches is limited by legislative restrictions and ongoing public debate. This review provides an updated and in-depth discussion on these issues.
The biotechnological approaches of transgenesis and the more recent eco-friendly new breeding techniques (NBTs), in particular, genome editing, offer useful strategies for genetic improvement of crops, and therefore, recently, they have been receiving increasingly more attention. The number of traits improved through transgenesis and genome editing technologies is growing, ranging from resistance to herbicides and insects to traits capable of coping with human population growth and climate change, such as nutritional quality or resistance to climatic stress and diseases. Research on both technologies has reached an advanced stage of development and, for many biotech crops, phenotypic evaluations in the open field are already underway. In addition, many approvals regarding main crops have been granted. Over time, there has been an increase in the areas cultivated with crops that have been improved through both approaches, but their use in various countries has been limited by legislative restrictions according to the different regulations applied which affect their cultivation, marketing, and use in human and animal nutrition. In the absence of specific legislation, there is an on-going public debate with favorable and unfavorable positions. This review offers an updated and in-depth discussion on these issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据