4.7 Article

Serum Vitamin D Metabolites by HPLC-MS/MS Combined with Differential Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Aspects of Sample Preparation without Derivatization

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098111

关键词

vitamin D metabolites; HPLC-MS/MS; differential ion mobility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the development of an HPLC-DMS-MS/MS method for the quantitation of vitamin D compounds in serum. The method combines liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction for sample preparation, eliminating the need for a lengthy derivatization step. Sensitivity is improved through the implementation of differential ion mobility separation. The assay shows good linearity, wide analytical range, and acceptable precision for all metabolites. The detection limit for 1,25(OH)(2)D-3 is 10 pg/mL.
In current clinical practice, a thorough understanding of vitamin D metabolism is in high demand both for patients with various diseases and for healthy individuals. Analytical techniques that provide simultaneous measurement of multiple metabolites are preferred. Herein, the development of an HPLC-DMS-MS/MS method for the quantitation of vitamin D compounds (25(OH)D-3, 25(OH)D-2, 1,25(OH)(2)D-3, 3-epi-25(OH)D-3, 24,25(OH)(2)D-3, and D-3) in serum is described. The selected sample preparation procedure based on the combination of liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction, which excluded a lengthy derivatization step, was compared with other common approaches. Sensitivity was increased through the implementation of differential ion mobility separation. The proposed assay allowed us to determine the low abundant 1,25(OH)(2)D-3 with the detection limit of 10 pg/mL. The validation study showed good linearity (r(2) > 0.99), a wide analytical range (2.5-75 ng/mL for 25(OH)D-3), and acceptable precision (<7%) for all metabolites. The recovery ranged from 71% to 93% and the matrix effect from 0.80 to 0.95 depending on the metabolite; accuracy determination was performed using DEQAS controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据