4.7 Review

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Organoids: Their Implication in COVID-19 Modeling

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043459

关键词

COVID-19; disease modeling; iPSCs; organoids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outbreak of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 has become a global health issue. Animal and monolayer culture models do not fully reflect the response of human tissues to the virus, but 3D in vitro culture models derived from iPSCs, such as organoids, show immense potential in COVID-19 modeling. This comprehensive review article summarizes the current knowledge on COVID-19 modeling and drug screening using iPSC-derived 3D culture models.
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a significant global health issue. This novel virus's high morbidity and mortality rates have prompted the scientific community to quickly find the best COVID-19 model to investigate all pathological processes underlining its activity and, more importantly, search for optimal drug therapy with minimal toxicity risk. The gold standard in disease modeling involves animal and monolayer culture models; however, these models do not fully reflect the response to human tissues affected by the virus. However, more physiological 3D in vitro culture models, such as spheroids and organoids derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), could serve as promising alternatives. Different iPSC-derived organoids, such as lung, cardiac, brain, intestinal, kidney, liver, nasal, retinal, skin, and pancreatic organoids, have already shown immense potential in COVID-19 modeling. In the present comprehensive review article, we summarize the current knowledge on COVID-19 modeling and drug screening using selected iPSC-derived 3D culture models, including lung, brain, intestinal, cardiac, blood vessels, liver, kidney, and inner ear organoids. Undoubtedly, according to reviewed studies, organoids are the state-of-the-art approach to COVID-19 modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据