4.7 Article

New Carbonate-Based Materials and Study of Cytotoxic Capacity in Cancer Cells

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065546

关键词

glioblastoma; breast cancer; vaterite; manganese; cysteine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the synthesis and functionalization of calcium carbonate-based materials for the treatment of glioblastoma. The incorporation of l-cysteine and manganese into the systems increased cell selectivity and cytotoxicity. Extensive characterization confirmed the effect of different fragments on the selectivity and cytotoxicity of the systems. The cytotoxicity studies on glioblastoma cells showed promising results for future in vivo studies.
Calcium carbonate, one of the most commonly found biominerals produced by organisms, has shown great potential for the development of systems with biological applications due to its excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and simple chemical composition. Here, we focus on the synthesis of various carbonate-based materials with vaterite phase control and their subsequent functionalization for applications in treating glioblastoma, one of the most limiting tumors currently without effective treatments. The incorporation of l-cysteine into the systems increased cell selectivity while the incorporation of manganese supplied the materials with cytotoxic capacity. Extensive characterization of the systems by infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and transmission electron microscopy confirmed the incorporation of the different fragments causing selectivity and cytotoxicity to the systems. To verify their therapeutic activity, the vaterite-based materials were tested in the CT2A cell line (murine glioma) and compared to SKBR3 (breast cancer) and HEK-293T (human kidney) cell lines. These studies on the cytotoxicity of the materials have shown promising results that can encourage future in vivo studies in glioblastoma models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据