4.7 Article

Regulation of Aqueous Humor Secretion by Melatonin in Porcine Ciliary Epithelium

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065789

关键词

melatonin; ciliary epithelium; gap junction; aqueous humor formation; glaucoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that melatonin has a significant impact on the secretion of aqueous humor in porcine ciliary epithelium. It stimulates the movement of Cl- and fluid from pigmented cells to non-pigmented cells through the activation of MT3 receptors, thereby increasing aqueous humor secretion.
Secretion of melatonin, a natural hormone whose receptors are present in the ciliary epithelium, displays diurnal variation in the aqueous humor (AH), potentially contributing to the regulation of intraocular pressure. This study aimed to determine the effects of melatonin on AH secretion in porcine ciliary epithelium. The addition of 100 mu M melatonin to both sides of the epithelium significantly increased the short-circuit current (Isc) by similar to 40%. Stromal administration alone had no effect on the Isc, but aqueous application triggered a 40% increase in Isc, similar to that of bilateral application without additive effect. Pre-treatment with niflumic acid abolished melatonin-induced Isc stimulation. More importantly, melatonin stimulated the fluid secretion across the intact ciliary epithelium by similar to 80% and elicited a sustained increase (similar to 50-60%) in gap junctional permeability between pigmented ciliary epithelial (PE) cells and non-pigmented ciliary epithelial (NPE) cells. The expression of MT3 receptor was found to be >10-fold higher than that of MT1 and MT2 in porcine ciliary epithelium. Aqueous pre-treatment with MT1/MT2 antagonist luzindole failed to inhibit the melatonin-induced Isc response, while MT3 antagonist prazosin pre-treatment abolished the Isc stimulation. We conclude that melatonin facilitates Cl- and fluid movement from PE to NPE cells, thereby stimulating AH secretion via NPE-cell MT3 receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据