4.7 Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Hype or Hope for Skeletal Muscle Anti-Frailty

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24097833

关键词

mesenchymal stem cell; extracellular vesicles; ageing; frailty; skeletal muscle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population ageing is increasing globally due to advancements in medical treatments and technologies. This leads to a higher prevalence of age-related diseases, such as muscle loss, among the older population. Current interventions only slow down and control symptoms, and there is no treatment to prevent or reverse age-related muscle frailty. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle (MSC-EV) therapy shows promise in attenuating age-related muscle frailty, but further studies, including large-scale clinical trials, are needed to determine its effectiveness.
Steadily rising population ageing is a global demographic trend due to the advancement of new treatments and technologies in the medical field. This trend also indicates an increasing prevalence of age-associated diseases, such as loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia), which tends to afflict the older population. The deterioration in muscle function can cause severe disability and seriously affects a patient's quality of life. Currently, there is no treatment to prevent and reverse age-related skeletal muscle ageing frailty. Existing interventions mainly slow down and control the signs and symptoms. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle (MSC-EV) therapy is a promising approach to attenuate age-related skeletal muscle ageing frailty. However, more studies, especially large-scale randomised clinical trials need to be done in order to determine the adequacy of MSC-EV therapy in treating age-related skeletal muscle ageing frailty. This review compiles the present knowledge of the causes and changes regarding skeletal muscle ageing frailty and the potential of MSC-EV transplantation as a regenerative therapy for age-related skeletal muscle ageing frailty and its clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据