4.7 Article

A Novel Approach for Screening Sericin-Derived Therapeutic Peptides Using Transcriptomics and Immunoprecipitation

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119425

关键词

therapeutic peptide; screening method; sericin; extracellular matrix; collagen; elastin; immunoprecipitation; natural resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel method of screening targeted therapeutic peptides in natural proteins was established, with details provided for library construction, transcription assays, receptor selection, therapeutic peptide screening, and biological activity analysis. This method successfully screened the therapeutic peptides TS263 and TS1000, which have the ability to specifically promote the synthesis of the extracellular matrix. We believe that this method provides a reference for screening other drugs in natural resources, including proteins, peptides, fats, nucleic acids, and small molecules.
With the demand for more efficient and safer therapeutic drugs, targeted therapeutic peptides are well received due to their advantages of high targeting (specificity), low immunogenicity, and minimal side effects. However, the conventional methods of screening targeted therapeutic peptides in natural proteins are tedious, time-consuming, less efficient, and require too many validation experiments, which seriously restricts the innovation and clinical development of peptide drugs. In this study, we established a novel method of screening targeted therapeutic peptides in natural proteins. We also provide details for library construction, transcription assays, receptor selection, therapeutic peptide screening, and biological activity analysis of our proposed method. This method allows us to screen the therapeutic peptides TS263 and TS1000, which have the ability to specifically promote the synthesis of the extracellular matrix. We believe that this method provides a reference for screening other drugs in natural resources, including proteins, peptides, fats, nucleic acids, and small molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据