4.7 Article

Structure-Based GC Investigation Sheds New Light on ITS2 Evolution in Corydalis Species

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24097716

关键词

internal transcribed spacer 2; GC-biased evolution; GC content; secondary structure; concerted evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The GC content of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) undergoes GC-biased evolution, with higher GC content than the adjacent 5.8S regions. The GCs are distributed in a heterogeneous manner in the ITS2 secondary structure, with paired regions being larger than unpaired regions, indicating selection for thermodynamic stability. Homogeneous ITS2 sequences are always GC-rich, supporting GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) and concerted evolution of ITS2.
Guanine and cytosine (GC) content is a fundamental component of genetic diversity and essential for phylogenetic analyses. However, the GC content of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) remains unknown, despite the fact that ITS2 is a widely used phylogenetic marker. Here, the ITS2 was high-throughput sequenced from 29 Corydalis species, and their GC contents were comparatively investigated in the context of ITS2's characteristic secondary structure and concerted evolution. Our results showed that the GC contents of ITS2 were 131% higher than those of their adjacent 5.8S regions, suggesting that ITS2 underwent GC-biased evolution. These GCs were distributed in a heterogeneous manner in the ITS2 secondary structure, with the paired regions being 130% larger than the unpaired regions, indicating that GC is chosen for thermodynamic stability. In addition, species with homogeneous ITS2 sequences were always GC-rich, supporting GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC), which occurred with ITS2's concerted evolution. The RNA substitution model inferred also showed a GC preference among base pair transformations, which again supports gBGC. Overall, structurally based GC investigation reveals that ITS2 evolves under structural stability and gBGC selection, significantly increasing its GC content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据