4.7 Review

Maintaining Genome Integrity: Protein Kinases and Phosphatases Orchestrate the Balancing Act of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair in Cancer

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210212

关键词

DNA damage; cancer therapeutics; kinase; phosphatase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal DNA damages that result in severe genome instability. Phosphorylation, which is one of the most important protein post-translation modifications, plays a vital role in regulating DSB repair. Kinases and phosphatases coordinate in DSB repair by adding or removing phosphate groups from various proteins. Understanding the function of kinases and phosphatases in DSBs repair is crucial for comprehending their role in cancer development and therapeutics.
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal DNA damages which lead to severe genome instability. Phosphorylation is one of the most important protein post-translation modifications involved in DSBs repair regulation. Kinases and phosphatases play coordinating roles in DSB repair by phosphorylating and dephosphorylating various proteins. Recent research has shed light on the importance of maintaining a balance between kinase and phosphatase activities in DSB repair. The interplay between kinases and phosphatases plays an important role in regulating DNA-repair processes, and alterations in their activity can lead to genomic instability and disease. Therefore, study on the function of kinases and phosphatases in DSBs repair is essential for understanding their roles in cancer development and therapeutics. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of kinases and phosphatases in DSBs repair regulation and highlight the advancements in the development of cancer therapies targeting kinases or phosphatases in DSBs repair pathways. In conclusion, understanding the balance of kinase and phosphatase activities in DSBs repair provides opportunities for the development of novel cancer therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据