4.7 Article

The Effect of Sex-Specific Differences on IL-10-/- Mouse Colitis Phenotype and Microbiota

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241210364

关键词

IBD; microbiota; colitis; Interleukin-10; mouse model; IL-10 knockout mice; female; sex differences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexual dimorphism plays an important role in understanding diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), however, the specific role of sex in IBD remains unclear. This study investigates the sex-dependent differences and inflammatory susceptibility in a commonly used IBD mouse model. The findings reveal that female mice lacking the IL-10 gene are more prone to developing intestinal inflammation and exhibit dysbiosis compared to males, highlighting the importance of considering sex in experimental designs and personalized medicine.
Sexual dimorphism is an important factor in understanding various diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While females typically exhibit stronger immune responses, the role of sex in IBD remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the sex-dependent differences and inflammatory susceptibility in the most extensively used IBD mouse model as they developed colitis. We monitored IL10-deficient mice (IL-10(-/-)) up to 17 weeks of age and characterized their colonic and fecal inflammatory phenotype, as well as their microbiota changes. Here, we originally identified IL-10(-/-) female mice as more prone to developing intestinal inflammation, with an increase in fecal miR-21, and dysbiosis with more detrimental characteristics compared to males. Our findings provide valuable insights into the sex-based differences in the pathophysiology of colitis and emphasize the importance of considering sex in experimental designs. Moreover, this study paves the way for future investigations aiming at addressing sex-related differences for the development of adequate disease models and therapeutic strategies, ideally enabling personalized medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据