4.5 Article

Cognitive and psychiatric comorbidities in neuromyelitis optica

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 360, 期 -, 页码 4-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.11.031

关键词

Neuromyelitis optica; Multiple sclerosis; Cognition; Psychopathology; Comorbidities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Our primary objective was to examine the neuropsychological and psychopathological profile of patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and compare these to multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control (HC) groups. We also examined for relationships between cognitive and psychiatric variables and clinical factors including accumulated neurological disability and disease duration. Methods: A neuropsychological test battery was administered along with a structured psychiatric interview and quantitative measures of mood symptoms. Results: 42 NMO, 42 MS and 42 HC participants were assessed. Cognitive impairments were observed in 67% of NMO patients. The prevalence and profile of cognitive impairments and lifetime prevalence of depression was similar between NMO and MS groups. However, significantly higher rates of recurrent depression and suicidality were observed in NMO patients. Correlational analyses revealed higher levels of anxiety symptoms were associated with shorter disease duration in NMO, while higher depression symptom levels were associated with higher neurological disability and poorer cognition. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate substantial cognitive and psychiatric comorbidities in NMO patients. Similar rates of lifetime and current depression between NMO and MS appear to mask greater underlying psychiatric burden in NMO and further understandings of the course of neurobehavioural comorbidities is required to better comprehend the additional morbidity in NMO. Our data support a role for cognitive and psychiatric assessments in the comprehensive care of NMO patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据