4.5 Article

Dual rotations of rods on thermosolutal convection in a porous cavity suspended by nanoencapsulated phase change materials

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217979224501959

关键词

ISPH method; fractional derivative; NEPCM; thermal radiation; porous media

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fractional time derivative of the ISPH method is used to address thermal radiation in thermosolutal convection in a porous cavity with NEPCMs. A study on the rotational velocities of two rods in a cavity of connected circular cylinders is presented. Controlling heat-mass transfer and velocity magnitude in different materials improves energy efficiency. Factors such as thermal radiation, fusion temperature, Rayleigh number, hot source length, Darcy number, and fractional order parameter are considered. The study highlights the influence of thermal/solutal conditions on dual convection flow and heat capacity contour.
The fractional of a time derivative for the incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (ISPH) method is adopted to handle thermal radiation on thermosolutal convection in a porous cavity barred by nanoencapsulated phase change materials (NEPCMs). A novel work on the rotational velocities of two rods during thermosolutal convection of NEPCMs within a novel cavity of two connected circular cylinders is introduced. The management of heat-mass transfer and velocity magnitude inside distinct designed materials below various boundary conditions carries improvements for energy efficiency. The physical factors are thermal radiation Rd=0-3, Fusion temperature ?f=0.05-0.8, Rayleigh number Ra=10(3)-10(6), hot source length L-Hot=0.4-1, Darcy number Da=10(-2)-10(-5), and fractional order parameter a=0.95-1. This study reported the role of thermal/solutal conditions in varying the dual convection flow and heat capacity contour. The lower Da provides an elevated porous resistance which decelerates the nanofluid velocity. The fusion temperature alters a heat capacity contour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据