4.7 Article

Dimensional analysis of hydrogen Knudsen compressor

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 83, 页码 32446-32458

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.051

关键词

Hydrogen flow; Knudsen compressor; Thermal transpiration effect; Dimensional analysis; Genetic algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic algorithm for enhancing the elite preservation strategy is extended to data-driven dimensional analysis and validated in the laminar boundary layer and the temperature difference characteristics of the Knudsen compressor. The research shows that the pressure rise, Poiseuille flow, and thermal transpiration flow of the Knudsen compressor have a first-order linear relationship with dimensionless numbers.
The genetic algorithm for enhancing the elite preservation strategy is extended to datadriven dimensional analysis and validated in the laminar boundary layer and the temperature difference characteristics of the Knudsen compressor. Microchannel positions, stages, and media are analyzed to verify the unification. The research shows that the pressure rise, Poiseuille flow, and thermal transpiration flow of the Knudsen compressor have a first-order linear relationship with dimensionless numbers. The statistic R2, which measures the accuracy of the prediction, is close to 1, and the error in predicting the maximum pressure rise is within 0.5%. The dimensionless number of pressure rise lies in the relative size of the square of high-pressure and low-pressure Knudsen numbers. The velocity dimensionless number lies in the product of the temperature rise rate and the flow direction Knudsen number. Introducing dimensionless numbers of pressure rise and velocity benefits hydrogen transport, compression, and control. The dimensional analysis method proposed in this study is also helpful for revealing and quantifying the flow mechanism of rarefied gases in microchannels. (c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据