4.7 Article

Scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy study of the effect of thermal oxide layers on the hydrogen release- Experiments and finite element method modelling

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 48, 期 87, 页码 34067-34076

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.142

关键词

Hydrogen Embrittlement; Scanning Kelvin Probe Force; Microscopy; Thermal Oxides; Finite Element Method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scanning Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (SKPFM) was used to investigate the diffusion of hydrogen in different areas, and a finite element method (FEM) model was developed to simulate the experiment and explain the observed contrast in hydrogen release.
Scanning Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (SKPFM) was used to study the hydrogen diffusion through a surface designed for simultaneous mapping of multiple areas containing different thermal oxides, all covered with Pd. Potential maps were obtained simultaneously on an area of bare iron as the reference, an area covered with a bilayer oxide (inner magnetite and outer hematite) and an area covered with a magnetite layer (obtained by removing the outer hematite layer of a bilayer oxide). After hydrogen charging at the bottom side of the specimen, a contrast was obtained in the potential mapping on the covering Pd layer due to differences in hydrogen release through these distinct areas on the specimen surface. A finite element method (FEM) model of hydrogen diffusion across the different phases was developed to simulate the experiment. The modelling showed that both a lower diffusion coefficient and a lower solubility in the oxide can explain the contrast obtained in SKPFM. Cross diffusion in the ferritic bulk underneath the thermal oxide was found to have an influence on the spatial distribution of the hydrogen release.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据