4.3 Article

Evaporation kinetics and quality attributes of grape juice concentrate as affected by microwave and vacuum processing

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 1596-1611

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2023.2218062

关键词

Juice concentrate; microwave-vacuum extraction; moisture ratio; phenolic compounds; effective diffusivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, grape juice was concentrated using a microwave vacuum-assisted technique to optimize processing conditions. Higher microwave power (80 W) and vacuum pressure (70 kPa) resulted in the highest evaporation rate and lowest moisture ratio. The Midilli model was found to best predict the moisture ratio, and the highest effective diffusivity, activation energy, and extraction yield were observed at 80 W and 70 kPa. The concentrate also exhibited higher antioxidant activities than fresh juice at 30 W. Overall, the microwave-vacuum technique significantly reduced processing time and energy requirement.
In this study, grape juice was concentrated through a microwave vacuum-assisted technique. The concentrate was prepared at different powers (30, 50, 80 W) and vacuum pressures (35, 50, 70 kPa) for different time intervals to optimize the processing conditions. The highest evaporation rate (5.32 g/100 g min) and the lowest moisture ratio (0.18) were observed at a higher level of microwave power (80 W) and vacuum pressure (70 kPa). Moreover, different mechanistic models were used to predict the values of the moisture ratio. Among them, the Midilli (R-2 = 0.999, SSE = 1.970 x 10(-8), RPD = 0.012%) model best fits the experimental values. The effective diffusivity (1.69 x 10(-14) m(2)/s), activation energy (1.56 W/kg), and extraction yield (69.30%) possessed maximum values at 80 W and 70 KPa. While concentrate had exhibited higher antioxidant activities (77.2%) than fresh juice (25.28%) at 30 W. Overall results indicated that the microwave-vacuum technique had significantly reduced the processing time and energy requirement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据