4.7 Article

Machine-learning-based high-benefit approach versus conventional high-risk approach in blood pressure management

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 1243-1256

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad037

关键词

Causal forest; high-benefit approach; heterogeneous treatment effect; blood pressure; cardiovascular events

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In medicine, using a machine-learning based high-benefit approach to treat high-risk patients can improve population health outcomes and is more effective than the traditional high-risk approach. Researchers found that treating patients with blood pressure over 130 mmHg using the high-benefit approach had better outcomes compared to the traditional high-risk approach. These findings suggest that the high-benefit approach has the potential to maximize treatment effectiveness.
Background In medicine, clinicians treat individuals under an implicit assumption that high-risk patients would benefit most from the treatment ('high-risk approach'). However, treating individuals with the highest estimated benefit using a novel machine-learning method ('high-benefit approach') may improve population health outcomes. Methods This study included 10 672 participants who were randomized to systolic blood pressure (SBP) target of either <120 mmHg (intensive treatment) or <140 mmHg (standard treatment) from two randomized controlled trials (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure). We applied the machine-learning causal forest to develop a prediction model of individualized treatment effect (ITE) of intensive SBP control on the reduction in cardiovascular outcomes at 3 years. We then compared the performance of high-benefit approach (treating individuals with ITE >0) versus the high-risk approach (treating individuals with SBP >= 130 mmHg). Using transportability formula, we also estimated the effect of these approaches among 14 575 US adults from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1999-2018. Results We found that 78.9% of individuals with SBP >= 130 mmHg benefited from the intensive SBP control. The high-benefit approach outperformed the high-risk approach [average treatment effect (95% CI), +9.36 (8.33-10.44) vs +1.65 (0.36-2.84) percentage point; difference between these two approaches, +7.71 (6.79-8.67) percentage points, P-value Conclusions The machine-learning-based high-benefit approach outperformed the high-risk approach with a larger treatment effect. These findings indicate that the high-benefit approach has the potential to maximize the effectiveness of treatment rather than the conventional high-risk approach, which needs to be validated in future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据