4.7 Article

Comparison of the Anode Side Catalyst Supports with and without Incorporation of Liquid Electrolyte Layer on the Performance of a Passive Direct Methanol Fuel Cell

期刊

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2023/1224995

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) operation, the catalyst and electrolyte play important roles in improving power output and reducing irreversible losses. This study investigates the use of different types of anode catalyst support and a liquid electrolyte layer to optimize methanol utilization and performance. The results show that the DMFC with Pt-Ru/C+ Pt-Ru/black anode catalyst and the LE layer exhibits the best performance, achieving a maximum power density of 5.328 mWcm(-2).
In the passive direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) operation, the catalyst plays an important role in electrical energy production. Efficient catalyst support increases the power output and simultaneously decreases irreversible losses in the fuel cell (FC). Effective utilization of methanol at the anode end reduces methanol crossover by selecting good anode catalyst supports. In the present study, two types of anode catalyst support of carbon and carbon black are used. The two types of anode catalysts are Pt-Ru/C+ Pt-Ru/black and Pt-Ru/C along with a 2 mm thick liquid electrolyte (LE) layer placed in the middle of the two half MEAs. The LE layer is made of piled hydrophilic filter papers, which are soaked in a solution of 1 M H2SO4 concentration. The methanol concentration is varied from 1 M to 12 M and from 1 M to 5 M with and without LE-inserted FC, respectively. The passive DMFC with Pt-Ru/C+ Pt-Ru/black anode catalyst and the LE layer exhibit the best performance, producing an MPD of 5.328 mWcm(-2) at a 5 M methanol concentration. The MPD produced by the anode catalyst of Pt-Ru/C+ Pt-Ru/black and Pt-Ru/C along with the 2 mm thickness LE layer incorporated fuel cell is 75.26% higher than conventional-based FC of anode catalyst of single-layer catalyst of Pt-Ru/C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据