4.6 Article

Prevalence of HSPB6 gene variants in peripartum cardiomyopathy: Data from the German PPCM registry

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 379, 期 -, 页码 96-99

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.03.028

关键词

Peripartum cardiomyopathy; Heart failure; HSPB6; Dilative cardiomyopathy; Whole exome sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

No high prevalence of HSPB6 gene variants was found in PPCM patients from the German PPCM registry compared to DCM patients. Further genetic analyses in larger cohorts and in cohorts of different etiologies of PPCM patients are needed to determine the role of genetic background in the pathogenesis of PPCM.
Background: Heat shock protein family B (small) member 6 (HSPB6) mediates cardioprotective effects against stress-induced injury. In humans two gene variants of HSPB6 have been identified with a prevalence of 1% in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a potentially life -threatening heart disease of unknown etiology in previously healthy women of whom 16-20% of PPCM carry gene variants associated with cardiomyopathy. This study was designed to analyze the prevalence of pathogenic HSPB6 gene variants in PPCM.Methods and results: Whole-exome sequencing was performed in whole blood samples of PPCM patients (n = 65 PPCM patients from the German PPCM registry) and screened subsequently for HSPB6 gene variants. In this PPCM cohort one PPCM patient carries a HSPB6 gene variant of uncertain significance (VUS), which was not associated with changes in the amino acid sequence and no likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants were detected.Conclusion: HSPB6 gene variants did not occur more frequently in a cohort of PPCM patients from the German PPCM registry, compared to DCM patients. Genetic analyses in larger cohorts and in cohorts of different ethi-ologies of PPCM patients are needed to address the role of the genetic background in the pathogenesis of PPCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据