4.7 Article

Engineering sodium alginate-SiO2 composite beads for efficient removal of methylene blue from water

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124279

关键词

Sodium alginate; Poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic; Porous composite beads; Adsorption; SiO2; acid)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous sodium alginate (SA)-silicon dioxide (SiO2) beads functionalized with poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid) (PAMPS) were prepared to enhance their adsorption capacity for cationic dye methylene blue (MB). The adsorption process followed pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model, indicating chemical adsorption and monolayer adsorption behavior. The maximum adsorption capacity obtained from Langmuir model was found to be 427.36, 495.05, and 564.97 mg/g at 25, 35, and 45 degrees C, respectively. Thermodynamic parameters indicated spontaneous and endothermic adsorption of MB on SA-SiO2-PAMPS.
The lack of sufficient active binding sites in commonly reported sodium alginate (SA)-based porous beads hampers their performances in adsorption of water contaminants. To address this problem, porous SA-SiO2 beads functionalized with poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid) (PAMPS) are reported in this work. Due to the porous properties and the existence of abundant sulfonate groups, the obtained composite material SASiO2-PAMPS shows excellent adsorption capacity toward cationic dye methylene blue (MB). The adsorption kinetic and adsorption isotherm studies reveal that the adsorption process fits closely to pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model, respectively, suggesting the existence of chemical adsorption and monolayer adsorption behavior. The maximum adsorption capacity obtained from Langmuir model is found to be 427.36, 495.05, and 564.97 mg/g under 25, 35, and 45 degrees C, respectively. The calculated thermodynamic parameters indicate that MB adsorption on SA-SiO2-PAMPS is spontaneous and endothermic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据