4.7 Article

Multifunctional xyloglucan-containing electrospun nanofibrous dressings for accelerating infected wound healing

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125504

关键词

Wound healing; Xyloglucan; Electrospun; Moisturizing properties; Nanofibrous; Antimicrobial properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a multifunctional electrospun nanofiber dressing (PCQX-M) was prepared for infected wound healing. PCQX-M demonstrated excellent absorption, moisturizing, mechanical, thermodynamic, biocompatible, and antibacterial properties. It significantly promoted cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and healing of infected wounds in a mouse model.
Preventing wound infection is a major challenge in biomedicine. Conventional wound dressings often have poor moisturizing and antimicrobial properties unfavorable for wound healing. In this study, we prepared a multifunctional electrospun nanofiber dressing (PCQX-M) containing xyloglucan, quaternized chitosan, Polyvinyl alcohol, and collagen. By applying the concept of wet healing, xyloglucan and quaternized chitosan polysaccharides with excellent water solubility were employed to improve the absorption and moisturizing properties and maintain a moist microenvironment for the wound healing process. PCQX-M demonstrated high mechanical, thermodynamic, and biocompatible properties, providing suitable healing conditions for wounds. In addition, PCQX-M showed exceptional antibacterial properties and a potential inhibitory effect on the growth of microorganisms in infected wounds. More intriguingly, the restorative healing effect was investigated on a mouse model of whole skin injury infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Wound healing, collagen deposition, and immunofluorescence results showed that PCQX-M significantly promoted cell proliferation and angiogenesis at the injury site and facilitated the healing of the infected wound. Our study suggests that PCQX-M has excellent potential for clinical application in infected wound healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据