4.7 Article

Carboxymethyl cellulose@multi wall carbon nanotubes functionalized with Ugi reaction as a new curcumin carrier

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123778

关键词

Carboxymethyl cellulose; Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; Ugi reaction; Carboxamide; Oral drug delivery; Curcumin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the fabrication of new drug delivery systems (DDSs) based on functionalization by multi-component reactions (MCRs) has received special attention. The CMC@MWCNTs@FCA carrier was designed and prepared from the functionalization of the CMC@MWCNTs as a biocompatible raw material with carboxamide group by the Ugi reaction. The obtained findings indicate that the fabricated system can be proposed as a biocompatible carrier for specific colon cancer treatment.
In recent years, the fabrication of new drug delivery systems (DDSs) based on functionalization by multi-component reactions (MCRs) has received special attention. In this regard, to obtain a new oral administra-tion system for colon-specific cancer treatment, the CMC@MWCNTs@FCA carrier was designed and prepared from the functionalization of the CMC@MWCNTs as a biocompatible raw material with carboxamide group by the Ugi reaction. FT-IR analysis confirmed the successful synthesis of the product through the change in the functional groups of reagents. Additionally, the crystalline structure and porosity of the samples were studied by XRD and BET techniques. After a detailed characterization, the curcumin (CUR) was loaded on CMC@MWCNTs and CMC@MWCNTs@FCA, respectively, about 29 % and 38 %. In vitro drug release behavior studies for CUR-loaded CMC@MWCNTs@FCA showed the controlled release for it, so 11.6 % and 76.5 % of CUR, respectively were released at pH 1.2 and pH 7.4. Toxicological analysis displayed the IC50 of CMC@MWCNTs@FCA@CUR is 752 mu g/mL. In conclusion, the obtained findings display that the fabricated system can be proposed as a biocompatible carrier for specific colon cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据