4.7 Article

A self-gelling powder based on polyacrylic acid/polyacrylamide/quaternate chitosan for rapid hemostasis

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123449

关键词

Self-gelling powder; Rapid hemostasis; Hydrogel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A self-gelling hemostasis powder based on polyacrylic acid/polyacrylamide/quaternate chitosan (PAA/PAM/QCS) is prepared to improve the hemostatic effect of non-compressible wounds, unknown bleeding points, and irregularly shaped wounds. The PAA/PAM/QCS rapidly forms a stable hydrogel when in contact with water and shows good adhesive properties on wet tissue surfaces. The introduction of QCS enhances the antibacterial activity of the self-gelling hemostasis powder.
In order to improve the hemostatic effect of the hemostatic dressing for non-compressible wounds, unknown bleeding points and irregularly shaped wounds, a self-gelling hemostasis powder based on polyacrylic acid/ polyacrylamide/quaternate chitosan (PAA/PAM/QCS) is prepared in this study. When in contact with water, the PAA/PAM/QCS can fuse and rapidly form a stable hydrogel in a short time (< 0.25 min). The PAA/PAM ratio is the main parameter that modulates the formation of the self-gel. The PAA/PAM self-gel can be formed only when the PAA/PAM ratio is 5:5, and the introduction of QCS does not influence the self-gelling behaviors and hydrogel stability. Moreover, the PAA/PAM/QCS self-gel shows good adhesive properties on wet tissue surfaces. In addition, the introduction of QCS improves the antibacterial activity of the self-gelling hemostasis powder. Furthermore, the prepared PAA/PAM/QCS powder can rapidly adsorb lots of blood, aggregate blood cells and platelets. The hemostatic results in vivo show that PAA/PAM/QCS powder is superior to the control group and commercial product groups (chitosan powder) with performance similar to hemostatic zeolite in terms of the amount of bleeding and hemostatic time. Therefore, the PAA/PAM/QCS self-gelling powder shows great application prospects for rapid hemostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据