4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal constraints of the cohesive modeling: A unified criterion for fluid-driven fracture

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nme.7227

关键词

cohesive zone model; dimensional analysis; fluid-driven fracture; scaling approach; spatial and temporal constraints; unified criterion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a unified criterion based on dimensional analysis to model fluid-driven fracture. The correlation between discretization and physical parameters of fluid-driven fracture is still unclear due to the nonlinear interaction between solid deformation and fluid flow. Through dimensionless analysis, this work establishes a correlation between cohesive element and time step sizes in a discrete regime. The proposed criterion is validated through numerical tests and provides spatial and temporal constraints for modeling fluid-driven fracture.
We present a unified criterion for cohesive modeling of fluid-driven fracture based on the dimensional analysis to simultaneously provide the constraint for cohesive element and time step sizes. Complicated by the nonlinear interaction between solid deformation and fluid flow, the underlying correlation between discretization and physical parameters of fluid-driven fracture is still unclear. This work studies this correlation through the dimensionless process of the governing equations that associate the cohesive element and time step sizes in a discrete regime. Three characteristic parameters (i.e., related to crack opening, fluid pressure, and fracture length) are introduced in the derivation, and two dimensionless parameters are proposed to construct the unified criterion. The criterion is validated by numerical tests of toughness-dominated fracture with various conditions including the modulus of solid, injection rate of fluid, fracture energy, and in-situ stress. The proposed criterion determines the spatial and temporal constraints of the cohesive zone model for modeling fluid-driven fracture, which is often treated empirically in previous practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据