4.7 Article

The implications of dual cavity location in a strut-mounted scramjet combustor

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106855

关键词

Scramjet; Strut injection; Dual cavity; Combustion efficiency; Total pressure loss

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of dual cavity locations with strut injection configuration on supersonic flow under reacting conditions is evaluated numerically. The study investigates the shock wave patterns and their association with shear layer mixing features at different locations of the top wall cavity and bottom wall cavity. The flow pattern, static pressure and temperature distributions, and performance analysis of the dual cavity designs associated with the results of the DLR scramjet are analyzed.
The effect of dual cavity locations with strut injection configuration in a supersonic flow under reacting con-ditions has been numerically evaluated. The simulation is performed by adopting a two-dimensional planar model utilizing RANS technique by applying SST k-& omega; turbulence model with single-step reaction chemistry. The top wall cavity is fixed at strut downstream, whereas the bottom wall cavity is mounted at four locations to analyze the shock wave pattern and their associations with shear layer mixing features. The flow pattern, static pressure and temperature distributions, and performance analysis throughout the combustor length for the dual cavity designs associated with the results of the DLR scramjet are investigated. Comparing the dual cavity structure with the baseline model results in a 25% reduction in combustion chamber length and complete combustion, while the total pressure drop increases by 20% due to the additional shock waves from the cavities. Nevertheless, the pressure drop for the cavity cases is less than 2% due to the replacement. Additionally, the combustion zone prolongs in the lateral direction as the dual cavities are located close to the strut injector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据