4.4 Article

Assessment of fracture healing in orthopaedic trauma

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.014

关键词

Bone fracture monitoring; Bone biomechanics; Radiostereometric analysis (RSA); Virtual stress testing (VST); Vibrational testing; Smart orthopaedic implants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fracture healing is a complex physiological process that relies on the interplay between biological and mechanical factors. Traditional imaging techniques are routinely used in orthopedic clinical practice but do not provide information on the biomechanical status of the fracture site. Recent advancements in non-invasive techniques and smart orthopedic implants have the potential to improve the assessment of fracture healing process and reduce patients' exposure to X-rays.
Fracture healing is a complex physiologic process, relying on the crucial interplay between biological and mechanical factors. It is generally assessed using imaging modalities, including conventional radiology, CT, MRI and ultrasound (US), based on the fracture and patient features. Although these techniques are routinely used in orthopaedic clinical practice, unfortunately, they do not provide any information about the biomechanical status of the fracture site. Therefore, in recent years, several non-invasive techniques have been proposed to assess bone healing using ultrasonic wave propagation, changes in electrical properties of bones and callus stiffness measurement. Moreover, different research groups are currently developing smart orthopaedic implants (plates, intramedullary nails and external fixators), able to provide information about the fracture healing process. These devices could significantly improve orthopaedic and trauma clinical practice in the future and, at the same time, reduce patients' exposure to X-rays. This study aims to define the role of traditional imaging techniques and emerging technologies in the assessment of the fracture healing process. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据