4.6 Article

Broadband antireflective coatings in the optical communication band deposited by ion-assisted reactive magnetron sputtering

期刊

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2023.104664

关键词

Antireflection coating; Optical communication; Reactive magnetron sputtering; Ion assistance; Silicon nitride

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of silicon-based photonics, silica and silicon nitride anti-reflection coatings with tunable refractive index were deposited by ion-assisted reactive magnetron sputtering. The optimized coatings exhibited average reflectance of 0.74% for single-layer and below 0.35% for multi-layer coatings. These coatings have broadband low reflectance and high deposition quality, making them suitable for optical communication devices.
With the rapid development of silicon-based photonics, broadband anti-reflection coatings for the optical communication band are desired. Silica and silicon nitride with tunable refractive index were employed in antireflection coatings, which were deposited by ion-assisted reactive magnetron sputtering. The results showed that the average reflectance of 0.74% for single-layer coatings and below 0.12% after optimization for each sub-band. With the insertion layer, the anti-reflection band broadened and covered the optical communication band. Multilayer coatings' average reflectance was reduced to within 0.35%, with only 0.19% for four-layer coatings. Both single-layer and multi-layer coatings exhibited impressive deposition quality. For single-layer and multi-layer coatings, no obvious defects were found on the surface and cross-sectional morphology, and the roughness remained within 0.5 nm. In this work, anti-reflection coatings were deposited by ion-assisted reflective magnetron sputtering, featuring broadband low reflectance and high deposition quality, which is suitable for serving optical communication devices such as photodetectors and wide-tunable lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据