4.7 Article

Group AHP framework based on geometric standard deviation and interval group pairwise comparisons

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 626, 期 -, 页码 370-389

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.01.034

关键词

Analytic hierarchy process; Geometric standard deviation; Interval weights; Consistency; Decision makers? satisfaction; Uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new group analytic hierarchy process (AHP) framework called GSD-IJ, which emphasizes group satisfaction with the final decision. GSD-IJ uses geometric mean and geometric standard deviation to aggregate individual scalar valued judgments into interval group judgments. The width of the group interval judgments is controlled by the parameter k, ensuring an acceptable degree of uncertainty while maximizing the group satisfaction index.
The complexity of multi-criteria decision problems requires the involvement of a group of experts, who can contribute their knowledge, experience and opinions to the decision -making process. The aim of this study is to present a new group analytic hierarchy process (AHP) framework, called GSD-IJ. The main idea is to emphasize group satisfaction with the final decision, which is measured by the group satisfaction index. GSD-IJ is based on geo-metric mean and geometric standard deviation and allows aggregation of individual scalar valued judgments into interval group judgments. The width of the group interval judg-ments is controlled by the parameter k, which ensures the acceptable degree of uncertainty of interval judgments, while providing the highest possible value of the group satisfaction index. Fuzzy preference programming is used to derive scalar-valued group weights from group interval pairwise comparison matrix. Three examples are given to evaluate and val-idate GSD-IJ. The results show that GSD-IJ performs well and is suitable for solving group multi-criteria decision problems.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据