4.6 Article

Comparison of culture media reveals that non-essential amino acids strongly affect the phenotype of human monocyte-derived macrophages

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imm.13670

关键词

flow cytometry; human; macrophage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of culture medium composition on monocyte-derived macrophage phenotype was investigated in this study. The results showed that changes in culture medium composition affected yield, cell size, gene expression, membrane protein levels, and release of soluble proteins. The most pronounced effects were observed when culturing macrophages in DMEM, which lacks certain non-essential amino acids.
Macrophages are important innate immune cells with the ability to adapt their phenotype to environmental cues. Research on human macrophages often uses monocyte-derived macrophages cultured in vitro, but it is unclear if culture medium affects macrophage phenotype. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of culture medium composition on monocyte-derived macrophage phenotype. Monocyte-derived macrophages were generated in different formulations of culture media (RPMI 1640, DMEM, MEM, McCoy's 5a and IMDM). Viability, yield and cell size were monitored, and RT-qPCR, flow cytometry or ELISA was used to compare levels of phenotype markers (CD163, CD206, CD80, TNFa, IL-10, SIRPa, LILRB1 and Siglec-10). Yield, cell size, gene expression, membrane protein levels and release of soluble proteins were all affected by changes in culture medium composition. The most pronounced effects were observed after culture in DMEM, which lacks the non-essential amino acids asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid and proline. Supplementation of DMEM with non-essential amino acids either fully or partly reversed most effects of DMEM on macrophage phenotype. The results suggest culture medium composition and amino acid availability affect the phenotype of human monocyte-derived macrophages cultured in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据