4.4 Article

Whole system radar modelling: Simulation and validation

期刊

IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1050-1060

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/rsn2.12399

关键词

Doppler radar; modelling; oscillators; phase noise; radar receivers; radar signal processing; radar transmitters; thermal noise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To meet the demands of radar applications, this article presents a practical method of modeling and simulating radar systems based on user requirements. It discusses the high-fidelity simulation of each building block in the radar model and validates the model by comparing it with real radar trial results. The article also briefly discusses the impact of radar oscillator phase noise in the range-Doppler plot.
The ever-expanding horizon of radar applications demands solutions with high-end radar functionalities and technologies and is often limited by the available radar equipment, cost and time. A practical method to tackle the situation is to rely on the modelling and simulation of radar systems based on the user requirements. The comprehensive system-level modelling of a pulsed Doppler radar in MATLAB/Simulink consisting of all the fundamental blocks in the transmit chain, the environment, the receive chain, and the data processing chain is presented in this article. The first half of the article discusses the high-fidelity simulation of each building block in the radar model. In the second half of the article, the range-Doppler plot generated from the high-fidelity radar model is compared and validated using the range-Doppler plot from a real radar trial. The radar phase noise plays a crucial role in the detection of slowly moving, low radar cross-section targets in the presence of strong clutter. The article also briefly discusses the effects of radar oscillator phase noise in the range-Doppler plot. The validated, fully flexible radar model has the advantage of supporting the addition of further building blocks and optimising the parameters based on user requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据