4.4 Article

System-based specifications for better design of ground-penetrating radar antennas

期刊

IET MICROWAVES ANTENNAS & PROPAGATION
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 478-493

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/mia2.12358

关键词

antenna theory; antennas; radar cross-sections; radar transmitters; ultra wideband antennas; ultra wideband radar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, there is no publicly available comprehensive set of specifications for ground-penetrating radar antennas. This study presents and derives specifications based on the antenna's interaction with the rest of the radar system to ensure reliable performance. By considering the whole system and operational parameters, these specifications aim to decrease the probability of deficiencies in antenna design impacting the radar's image output.
Currently, no publicly available comprehensive set of specifications exists for the design of ground-penetrating radar antennas. Specifications are presented and derived for the design of a ground-penetrating radar antenna based on the antenna's interaction with the rest of the radar system. Typically, ground-penetrating radar antenna engineers are given basic parameters such as gain and bandwidth to design an antenna. An antenna can be designed to meet those specifications but may not perform well in a ground-penetrating radar imaging system. By considering the whole system, including the operation parameters, expected targets, and signal processing algorithms, we can constrain the less-commonly considered performance aspects of an antenna to perform more reliably in a deployment. We propose quantitative specifications for the antenna's coupling, beamwidth, boresight radar cross-section, pulse integrity, residual ringing, and front-to-back ratio. Meeting these antenna specifications will decrease the probability that a deficiency in the antenna design impacts the radar's image output. Finally, a summarised design equation table that will be helpful in the ground-penetrating radar antenna community at large is offered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据