4.7 Review

A Decade of MRI Compatible Robots: Systematic Review

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 862-884

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2022.3212626

关键词

Actuation systems; haptics; image-guided interventions; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); MRI-compatible robots; rehabilitation robots; robotics; sensors; surgical robots

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides better visualization for diagnosis, interventional radiology, and surgery without X-ray exposure. The symbiosis of MRI and robotics can improve patient outcomes and surgical convenience. Technological advancements have led to the development of MRI-compatible robots. This article reviews the literature on robotic systems developed for the MRI environment between 2009 and 2021, discussing surgical robots, sensing solutions, research emphasis, limitations, and prospects.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers better visualization for diagnosis, interventional radiology, and surgery from other imaging modalities without X-ray exposure. Medical robots have provided solutions for many surgical and rehabilitation procedures. A symbiosis of MRI and robotics can allow manipulation in closed MR-gantry, decrease trauma, operation, and recovery time for patients and improve the dexterity, convenience, and surgical outcome for physicians. However, the inherent properties and limitations of MR scanners had hindered their development. Technological advancements in the field of computers, additive manufacturing, and sensing in the past decade have changed robotics and the focus shifted again toward MRI-compatible robots. This article provides a compendium of the state-of-the-art literature on robotic systems developed for the MRI environment presented between 2009 and 2021. The systematic review discusses surgical and fMRI study robots, the actuation, and sensing solutions developed to assist such robots, recent research emphasis, current limitations, and prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据