4.4 Article

Electromagnetic Calculation of Tubular Permanent Magnet Linear Oscillation Actuator Considering Corrected Air Gap Permeance

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2023.3243833

关键词

2-D finite element analysis (FEA); corrected factor; equivalent magnetic circuit method; permanent magnet linear oscillation actuator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an electromagnetic calculation method for the tubular permanent magnet linear oscillation actuator (TPMLOA). The improved topology of the TPMLOA is introduced, and the actual air gap length is derived using the radially laminated stator and equivalent magnetic circuit method. The electromagnetic characteristic of the TPMLOA is analyzed using 2-D finite-element analysis, and the results are compared with normal 2-D and 3-D FEA results. A prototype is also tested to verify the accuracy of the calculated results. The proposed method can quickly and accurately calculate the electromagnetic performance.
Tubular permanent magnet linear oscillation actuator (TPMLOA), with a simple structure and convenient control, has been paid extensive attention in the field of compressors and industry applications. In this article, an electromagnetic calculation method of the TPMLOA is proposed. First, an improved topology of the TPMLOA is introduced. Then, based on the radially laminated stator and equivalent magnetic circuit method, the actual air gap length is derived, and the total corrected factor is given. Finally, the electromagnetic characteristic of the TPMLOA is analyzed by 2-D finite-element analysis (FEA) considering the corrected air gap permeance, and the results are compared with normal 2-D and 3-D FEA results. Additionally, a prototype of the TPMLOA is manufactured and tested to verify the accuracy of the calculated results. The comparison results show that the proposed method can quickly and accurately calculate the electromagnetic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据