4.4 Article

Evaluation of Memory Capacity and Time Series Prediction Using a Spin Hall Oscillator as Reservoir

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2023.3266517

关键词

Oscillators; Reservoirs; Task analysis; Magnetization; Limit-cycles; Transient analysis; Time series analysis; Memory capacity; nonlinear magnetization dynamics; reservoir computing (RC); spin Hall oscillators (SHOs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a spintronic device called spin Hall oscillator (SHO) is used as the reservoir in reservoir computing (RC) architecture. By evaluating the memory capacity of the SHO system with micromagnetic simulations, it is found that the reservoir's memory capacity is correlated with its efficiency in performing temporal tasks.
Spintronic devices, such as spin Hall oscillators (SHOs) and spin transfer torque oscillators, have become popular candidates for use as the reservoir in the reservoir computing (RC) architecture. The memory capacity of a reservoir quantifies the amount of information retained at any given time, indicating its significance for different RC tasks. In this work, we consider an SHO, consisting of a bilayer structure of platinum/Permalloy, as the reservoir. Using micromagnetic simulations, we evaluate the change in memory capacity of the SHO system as the magnetization dynamics varies from transient state oscillations to limit cycle oscillations. We also perform a three-bit parity task to study the performance of the oscillator in carrying out a nonlinear task. A time series prediction task, namely, the nonlinear auto regressive moving average (NARMA)2 task, is also performed. The results of both tasks confirm a correlation between the evaluated memory capacity of the reservoir and its efficiency in performing temporal tasks. The best performance in RC tasks is observed when the output magnetization dynamics of the oscillator consists of both transient state and limit cycle oscillations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据