4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Global Maximum Power Point Tracking in Dynamic Partial Shading Conditions Using Ripple Correlation Control

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 2030-2040

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2022.3228227

关键词

Maximum power point tracking (MPPT); ripple correlation control (RCC); partial shading condition (PSC); solar photovoltaic (PV) systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a two-level algorithm to track the global maximum power point in photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions. The algorithm combines discretized global search and ripple correlation control technique, ensuring accurate and swift tracking of the global maximum power point.
Under partial shading conditions (PSC), a photovoltaic (PV) system may produce multiple local maximum power points (LMPPs). Traditional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques are not able to distinguish between LMPPs and the global maximum power point (GMPP), leading to sub-optimal PV array power outputs. This article proposes a two-level algorithm for tracking the GMPP. The first level is a discretized global search, allowing the system to hone in on the neighborhood containing the GMPP. In the second level, the well-known ripple correlation control (RCC) technique is used to swiftly converge to the GMPP. Using the proposed two-level algorithm, it can be guaranteed that the GMPP is successfully found and tracked. A benchmark analysis involving other state of the art algorithm reveals that the proposed method is the most superior algorithm in terms of accurately and swiftly tracking the global maximum power point in dynamic partial shading conditions. The algorithm is implemented with a simple inexpensive microcontroller, and therefore can be readily adopted in a myriad of dynamic partial shading applications.Therefore, this work allows the penetration of future photovoltaic power conversion systems to be more efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据