4.8 Article

A Single-Phase Common-Ground Five-Level Transformerless Inverter With Low Component Count for PV Applications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 2662-2674

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3161825

关键词

Leakage currents; multilevel inverter (MLI); neutral point voltage balance; reactive power regulation; switched capacitor (SC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A switched-capacitor based five-level transformerless inverter configuration is proposed in this article, which uses multicarrier phase disposition pulsewidth modulation strategy for reactive power regulation and voltage self-balancing. The presented topology effectively solves the leakage current problem and has reduced switching losses.
Multilevel inverters (MLIs) featuring reactive power ability and common ground (CG) have become much popular in transformerless grid-tied photovoltaic applications. A switched-capacitor (SC) based five-level transformerless inverter configuration is thus proposed in this article, which requires only six switches, one diode, three capacitors, and one input dc voltage supply. Notably, only four power switches are operated in high frequency, thus, the switching losses are reduced. Moreover, the presented topology can effectively tackle the leakage current problem using a CG architecture. A multicarrier phase disposition pulsewidth modulation strategy is employed to achieve reactive power regulation and SC voltage self-balancing. To achieve the neutral point voltage balance of the presented five-level inverter, a simple closed-loop voltage-balancing control method is proposed. The operation principles with modulation strategy and voltage self-balancing of SC are discussed in depth. Comparisons between the proposed and the state-of-the-art MLIs are presented in detail. Finally, experimental tests on a single-phase 1.1-kW prototype validate the appropriate performance of the proposed inverter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据