4.6 Article

Analytical Analysis of Cogging Torque in Permanent Magnet Machines With Unequal North and South Poles, With Particular Reference to Consequent Pole Machines

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 1361-1375

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2022.3221917

关键词

Cogging torque; consequent pole; energymethod; permanent magnet (PM) machines; torque ripple

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a general analytical model to analyze the cogging torque in consequent pole permanent magnet (CPPM) machines and other rotor PM machines with unequal north and south poles as well as pole shifting. The optimal slot opening and optimal pole-arc to pole-pitch ratio with/without pole shifting for minimal cogging torque are derived analytically and validated by finite element analyses and experiments. The findings reveal that the cogging torque in PM machines with unequal poles follows a different order than conventional PM machines with equal poles.
In this paper, a general analytical model is developed to analyze the cogging torque accounting for unequal north and south poles as well as pole shifting, which can be applied to consequent pole permanent magnet (CPPM) machines and other rotor PM machines. The optimal slot opening and optimal pole-arc to pole-pitch ratio with/without pole shifting for minimum cogging torque are then analytically derived and verified by finite element analyses and experiments. It shows that in contrast to conventional PMmachines with equal north and south poles, of which the fundamental cogging torque order is the least common multiple (LCM) between slot number Ns and pole number 2p, the fundamental cogging torque order for the PM machines with unequal north and south poles (as often the case in CPPM machines), is the LCM between N-s and p, which has been derived analytically. However, in the special case when the slot number in one submachine is even, the LCM between Ns and 2p has the same value as the LCM between Ns and p.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据