4.7 Article

Maximally Permissive Supervisors for Nonblocking Similarity Control of Nondeterministic Discrete-Event Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 3529-3544

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2022.3195152

关键词

Automata; Supervisory control; Heuristic algorithms; Discrete-event systems; Upper bound; Trajectory; Task analysis; Maximal permissiveness; nonblocking supervisor; nondeterministic discrete-event system; partial observation; similarity control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the problem of synthesizing a nonblocking supervisor for nondeterministic discrete-event systems, such that the supervised system follows a given specification. The article proposes an algorithm that converts a possibly blocking supervisor to a nonblocking one by iteratively removing certain states. Additionally, the article identifies key properties for input supervisors that guarantee the maximal permissiveness of the output nonblocking supervisors.
This article investigates a nonblocking similarity control problem for nondeterministic discrete-event systems, which is a problem of synthesizing a nonblocking supervisor such that the supervised system is simulated by the given specification. In this article, the state of the system is not required to be observable, and the event occurrence is allowed to be partially observed. We propose an algorithm that computes a nonblocking supervisor from a possibly blocking one by iteratively removing certain states. Then, we identify two key properties of input supervisors, named state-unmergedness and strong maximal permissiveness, which together guarantee the maximal permissiveness of output nonblocking supervisors. The algorithm is applied to a supervisor with these two properties to obtain a maximally permissive nonblocking supervisor. In addition, we show that a nonblocking supervisor is generated by the algorithm if and only if there exists a solution to the nonblocking similarity control problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据