4.7 Article

Sparse Antenna Array With Flat-Top and Sharp Cutoff Radiation Patterns

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 4695-4703

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2023.3262362

关键词

Flat-top pattern; sharp cutoff; sparse antenna array; square-shaped

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a sparse antenna array with flat-top and sharp cutoff radiation patterns is introduced. The array is composed of 16 antenna elements, realized by applying a symmetrical sparse configuration with uniform excitation phase. The proposed dual-band dual-polarized base station antenna, based on the sparse antenna arrays, demonstrates excellent radiation performance in the frequency bands of 1.71-2.17 and 2.30-2.69 GHz, with compact size and few antenna elements.
A sparse antenna array with flat-top and sharp cutoff radiation patterns is presented in this work. The array consists of 16 antenna elements, which is realized by applying a symmetrical sparse configuration with uniform excitation phase. This configuration simplifies the excitations of the array while maintaining excellent radiation performance. The dual-band dual-polarized base station antenna based on the proposed sparse antenna arrays in the bands of 1.71-2.17 and 2.30-2.69 GHz is fabricated and measured. The measured results are in very good agreement with the predicted ones, showing that the port reflection coefficient is less than -15.0 dB, and the isolation is greater than 28.5 dB. In addition, the array has a gain of 10.1-12.3 dB, a half-power beamwidth (HPBW) of 45 degrees +/- 5 degrees in both the horizontal and vertical planes, a cutoff transition of less than 17.4 degrees from -3 to -20 dB between the main beam and the sidelobe area, and a sidelobe level suppressed to below -21.1 dB. Apart from the good radiation performance, the proposed sparse antenna array has a compact size with very few antenna elements, which is very suitable for communication in a crowded scene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据