4.7 Article

Complete Nonuniform Asymptotic Expansion of Sommerfeld Integral for Dielectric Half-Space

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 3571-3580

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2023.3244007

关键词

Dielectrics; Impedance; Permittivity; Reflection coefficient; Closed-form solutions; Symbols; Standards; Complete nonuniform asymptotic expansion; dielectric half-space; Sommerfeld integral (SI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new finite-range integral representation is proposed for the approximation of the Sommerfeld integral for a dielectric half-space. The complete nonuniform asymptotic expansion of the integral is analytically formulated based on the known expansion for an impedance half-plane. The accuracy of the expansion is numerically examined, and a numerical procedure is proposed for calculating the higher order terms.
Generally, the Sommerfeld integral (SI) for a dielectric half-space is approximated based on the steepest descent method. A higher order approximation of the integral requires higher order derivatives of the integrand in the steepest descent path in the complex domain, whose explicit formulation may be cumbersome. Recently, a new finite-range integral representation of the SI has been proposed, whose integrand is written in terms of the SI for an impedance half-plane. Based on the known complete nonuniform asymptotic expansion of the SI for an impedance half-plane, the complete nonuniform asymptotic expansion can be analytically formulated for the dielectric half-space. Moreover, the completeness is mathematically proven such that the expansion satisfies the recurrence relation for the Wilcox expansion. The accuracy of the proposed expansion is numerically examined for several propagation scenarios. Furthermore, a numerical procedure is proposed to calculate the higher order terms of the expansion by partially using the impedance approximation for a large relative permittivity of the half-space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据