4.7 Article

Dual-Parameter Sensing of Parallel Fiber Sagnac Interferometer Based on Vernier Effect

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 6769-6778

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3247720

关键词

Sensors; Sensitivity; Optical fiber sensors; Temperature sensors; Strain; Optical fibers; Temperature measurement; Parallel Sagnac interferometers (SIs); polarization-maintaining fiber (PMF); strain sensor; temperature sensor; Vernier effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a parallel-fiber-loop interferometer based on Vernier effect for strain and temperature detection. The interference is generated between the outputs of two parallel fiber Sagnac interferometers. The feasibility of the system is proved theoretically and experimentally. The device has the advantages of simple structure, low cost, high sensitivity, and good stability, and has a promising application prospect in strain and temperature measurement.
A parallel-fiber-loop interferometer based on Vernier effect is proposed to detect strain and temperature. The interference generates between the outputs of two parallel fiber Sagnac interferometers (PSIs). Each SI is inserted into a polarization-maintaining fiber (PMF) with the same type but different length. The feasibility of the system is proven theoretically and experimentally. In the interference spectrum, it is observed that the sensor has clearer upper and lower limits than the cascade structure, which is more beneficial to track the drift of spectral envelope. Experimental results showed that the strain sensitivity increased from 8.13 pm/mu e for the single SI to 61.98 pm/mu epsilon for the PSIs. The temperature sensitivity increased from -1.51 nm/degrees C for the single SI to -14.32 nm/degrees C for the PSIs and the magnification is amplified eight times. The device has the advantages of simple structure, low cost, high sensitivity, and good stability, which has a good application prospect in strain and temperature measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据