4.5 Article

Co-Existence of Watt-Level Dissipative Solitons and Synchronous Dual-Wavelength Mode-Locked Pulses in Yb Fiber Laser

期刊

IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 625-628

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2023.3268769

关键词

Fiber lasers; Optical fiber dispersion; Optical fiber polarization; Laser mode locking; Power lasers; Laser theory; Optical pulse generation; High average power; mode-locking; dissipative solitons; synchronous dual-wavelength pulses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a high-average-power laser configuration that can simultaneously generate dissipative solitons (DSs) and synchronous dual-wavelength mode-locked (ML) pulses. This is achieved through the use of large-mode-area (LMA) fibers along with a birefringence-based chirped-pulse spectral filter. This configuration allows for the generation of DSs with average power up to 5.8W and pulse width as short as 178fs, as well as synchronous dual-wavelength ML pulses with average power up to 1.5W at central wavelengths of 1029.7nm and 1046.1nm respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this simultaneous observation of DSs and synchronous dual-wavelength pulses has not been achieved in watt-level fiber lasers.
We present a high-average-power laser configuration to simultaneously generate both dissipative solitons (DSs) and synchronous dual-wavelength mode-locked (ML) pulses using large-mode-area (LMA) fibers in combination with a birefringence-based chirped-pulse spectral filter. DSs with average power as high as 5.8 W and pulse width as short as 178 fs are obtained at the output port. Meanwhile, up to 1.5 W average power in synchronous dual-wavelength ML pulsed operation is also obtained at the rejected port with central wavelengths located at 1029.7 nm and 1046.1 nm respectively. To our knowledge, observation of such behavior with both DSs and synchronous dual-wavelength pulse generation simultaneously has not been yet realized in watt-level fiber lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据