4.6 Article

Predicting ExWAS findings from GWAS data: a shorter path to causal genes

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-023-02548-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GWAS has identified numerous loci associated with disease, but the specific causal genes are largely unknown. Determining these genes would enhance our understanding of the disease and aid in genetics-based drug development.
GWAS has identified thousands of loci associated with disease, yet the causal genes within these loci remain largely unknown. Identifying these causal genes would enable deeper understanding of the disease and assist in genetics-based drug development. Exome-wide association studies (ExWAS) are more expensive but can pinpoint causal genes offering high-yield drug targets, yet suffer from a high false-negative rate. Several algorithms have been developed to prioritize genes at GWAS loci, such as the Effector Index (Ei), Locus-2-Gene (L2G), Polygenic Prioritization score (PoPs), and Activity-by-Contact score (ABC) and it is not known if these algorithms can predict ExWAS findings from GWAS data. However, if this were the case, thousands of associated GWAS loci could potentially be resolved to causal genes. Here, we quantified the performance of these algorithms by evaluating their ability to identify ExWAS significant genes for nine traits. We found that Ei, L2G, and PoPs can identify ExWAS significant genes with high areas under the precision recall curve (Ei: 0.52, L2G: 0.37, PoPs: 0.18, ABC: 0.14). Furthermore, we found that for every unit increase in the normalized scores, there was an associated 1.3-4.6-fold increase in the odds of a gene reaching exome-wide significance (Ei: 4.6, L2G: 2.5, PoPs: 2.1, ABC: 1.3). Overall, we found that Ei, L2G, and PoPs can anticipate ExWAS findings from widely available GWAS results. These techniques are therefore promising when well-powered ExWAS data are not readily available and can be used to anticipate ExWAS findings, allowing for prioritization of genes at GWAS loci.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据